Tuesday, January 16, 2007
It Looks Like Sen. Obama is Running
But check out this great speech by Sen. Edwards.
It was great. He said what really needs to be said, but isn't being said by the presumptive front runners.
Monday, January 15, 2007
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Dr. King changed America and left it a far better place. He overcame hatred, oppression and injustice without bitterness or negatively. He knowingly gave his life for the cause of justice and did not flinch from his calling, even though his fate was obvious to him. He successfully opposed the forces of darkness without letting his heart be tainted by the darkness he fought.
So please, do yourself a favor, go to the links below to read about this incredible American and be inspired to be a better American and a better person.
The King Center
The Nobel Prize Organization
Time Magazine
His most famous speech
Sunday, January 14, 2007
A Lot of The Republicans in Congress
Freed from the pressures of being the majority and from the heavy hand of former leaders including retired representative Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), many back-bench Republicans are showing themselves to be more moderate than their conservative leadership and increasingly mindful of shifting voter sentiment. The closest vote last week -- Friday's push to require the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare -- pulled 24 Republicans. The Democrats' homeland security bill attracted 68 Republicans, the minimum wage increase 82.
Of Course there is one Republican who is oblivious to reality. Too bad he's the one who really counts.
Its Tough
UnAmerican
Utterly disgusting, but not that surprising.
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Friday, January 12, 2007
Thursday, January 11, 2007
The Bush Administration is Held Accountable
Interesting Quote
Sen. Mikulski (D-MD): "This is a reckless plan - it is about saving the Bush presidency, not about saving Iraq."
Bush's Escalation Plan
Won't change the situation in Iraq.
But it has kept the House Democrat's recent accomplishments off the front pages.
The Democrats have voted to raise the minimum wage and to implement the 911 Commission's recommendations. But they aren't getting any headlines.
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
The Escalation
Basically, we have a President going against the advise of his generals and the American People, again. The real shame is that the President's real aim is to delay the inevitable, until it becomes the next President's problem. That means Bush is willing to let Americans die to make himself look better.
What's Congress going to do about it?
Yet Another Republican Failure
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Here We Go Again
The 100 Hours Starts Today
Monday, January 08, 2007
Meanwhile
I'm not unhappy about the way this worked out. We will now get a year to collect data on the effectiveness, fairness and real costs of this tax cut, then we can go forward armed with the facts.
An Observation
Just something for Democrats to think about.
CDC January Meeting
Next Wednesday evening, January 10, will be the Columbia Democratic Club's January membership meeting. As usual, the meeting will be held at the Jeffers Hill Neighborhood Center, 6030 Tamar Drive in Columbia. The meeting agenda is as follows:
Beginning at 7:00 p.m. noted political commentator - often featured on National Public Radio - UMBC Professor Tom Schaller will be on hand for a book signing of his latest publication, Whistling Past Dixie. The book argues that religion and race have already swung the South irrevocably to the GOP and to "value voters." Dr. Schaller advises the Democrats to focus on the Midwest and Interior Western states, which are now more receptive to Democratic messages thanks to pocketbook issues and changing demographics. Cost of the book is $20. Cash and checks will be accepted. Tom will also have some prepared remarks at 7:30 p.m.
Following an abbreviated business meeting, the January program beginning at 8:00 p.m. will include a presentation by Howard County Council Chair Calvin Ball and a to-be-announced member of the Howard County State Legislative Delegation, to speak to and share with CDC members, their thoughts on the year's expected legislative issues. These presentations will set the stage for an interactive discussion led by CDC Legislation Committee Co-Chairs, Kristen Neville and Josh Tzuker, on legislative issues of interest to CDC members. This discussion will help CDC develop its anticipated proactive 2007 legislative agenda.
Please mark your calendars now, and plan to join your fellow Democrats and CDC colleagues for an informative and entertaining evening. Light refreshments will be provided.
Good News!
Sunday, January 07, 2007
Speaker Pelosi Throws Down the Gauntlet
It looks like the Democratic Congress is going to confront Bush in Iraq. That's great news.
Saturday, January 06, 2007
Another Good Move by the Democratic Congress
I'm really beginning to like what I see of this Congress.
Democrats Confront Bush on Iraq
But what will Bush do?
The selection of Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus to serve as the senior American commander in Iraq signals an important turn in United States strategy. As a supporter of increased forces in Iraq, General Petraeus is expected to back a rapid five-brigade expansion, in sharp contrast to his predecessor, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., who has been openly skeptical that additional troops would help stabilize the country.
Friday, January 05, 2007
CBS POLL: AMERICANS OPTIMISTIC ABOUT DEMOCRATS; WANT OUT OF IRAQ
The Democrats in Congress have a unique opportunity to both advance the interests of our nation and the Democratic Party by getting us out.
Its going to be a very interesting two years.
Is a Constitutional Showdown Looming?
I predict these are the first inklings of a big story.
Thursday, January 04, 2007
So there Will Be a Senior Tax Cut Task Force After All
An End to Bush's Tax Cuts for the Rich?
Pelosi Fundraiser: $1000 a Deadhead
On Thursday night, Mrs. Pelosi is having a $1,000-a-head fund-raiser with performances by Tony Bennett, Carole King, Wyclef Jean and the surviving members of the Grateful Dead. “Ms. Pelosi is a huge Dead fan,” her spokeswoman said.
Sometimes One Line Tells it All
Somethings you just don't play politics with. One of which is the lives of our people in the military. Oy!
Dana Milbank
Ethics
Senator Obama proposes an independent ethics commission, in this OpEd appearing in today's Post.
Here's the NYTimes take.
Good things are happening, lets hope the Republicans and Joe Lieberman types don't muck it up.
Could this Be A Good Sign?
And can we trust Bush?
Democrats Unveil a Real Energy Policy
House Democrats are crafting an energy package that would roll back billions of dollars worth of oil drilling incentives, raise billions more by boosting federal royalties paid by oil and gas companies for offshore production, and plow the money into new tax breaks for renewable energy sources, congressional sources said yesterday.Its nice to have the grown-ups in charge again.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
Don't Miss
A New Congress
Anyway, its shaping up to be interesting. CNN has this take on the relationship. The Times writes that Bush is trying to regain the initiative. The Post Reports that Bush is promising to balance the Budget . . . in 2012, six years after he leaves office. It its an interesting read with lots of choice nuggets, like this:
He went on to tout his economic policies, which he said have "allowed us to meet our goal of cutting the budget deficit in half three years ahead of schedule."
Hmm, he's bragging about fixing a problem he caused in the first place. And of course he's lying about it too:
The claim that the federal budget deficit has been cut in half stems from the administration's original projection of a $512 billion deficit for 2004, a number that critics have said was inflated, especially since the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) was forecasting $477 billion at the time.
Meanwhile Bush blames everyone but himself for the mess. But who invaded Iraq? And what about the Bush tax cuts for the very rich?
Some economists also have charged that Bush has claimed unwarranted credit for his tax cuts, which they say have cost the Treasury more in lost revenue than has been gained from their economic stimulus effect.
According to Alan D. Viard, a former Bush White House economist who joined the American Enterprise Institute, "Federal revenue is lower today than it would have been without the tax cuts. There's really no dispute among economists about that."
Viard said in October there was "no evidence" that Bush's tax cuts come anywhere close to paying for themselves, a conclusion shared by economists at the Treasury Department and the nonpartisan CBO, Washington Post staff writer Lori Montgomery reported.
The Congressional Research Service has estimated that economic growth fueled by the tax cuts is likely to generate revenue worth about 7 percent of their total cost, which amounts to about $1.1 trillion since 2001.
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
The Hipocracy is Simply Stunning
Excuse Me, But the American Public Chose the Democrats to Run Congress
Monday, January 01, 2007
A Must Read on the Healthcare Crisis
WHAT is the most pressing problem facing the economy? A good case can be made for the developing health care crisis. Soaring costs, growing ranks of uninsured and a steady erosion of corporate health benefits add up to a giant drag on the nation’s future prosperity.The article goes on to argue that single payer health insurance would be a boon for the economy. A point I (and many others) have been making for a long time. Too bad it's unlikely to happen soon. Why is this?
There’s only one catch. Most Americans just don’t believe it can be done. The health care crisis may turn out to be more of a problem of ideology than economics.
Sunday, December 31, 2006
A Tragic Milestone
Now go out and party. Oy.
Its Not that Often that David Keelan and fineline Agree
Now do you see why the Senior Tax Cut gets under my skin?
Update: I don't agree with every thing David says in the Post. I most definitely am Not in favor of cutting back on the County Executive's transportation and security details or cutting any county-provided services. I think we have to bite the bullet and raise taxes. Of course I believe any tax increases should be progressive in nature. But David does draw attention to an important issue. I guess there had to be a catch.;-)
George W. Bush's Invasion of Iraq: the Worst Thing to Happen to the United States (and Iraq) Since Slavery?
The question's are (1) what can the Democrats do to get us out of Iraq and (2) what will the Democrats try to do about Iraq?
It doesn't take a genius to see that the American People sent a strong unambiguous message to Washington in November: get us out of Iraq and clean up the corruption. Did our leaders get the message?
If the Democrats succeed in cleaning up the ethical mess and getting us out of Iraq, they will win big in 2008 and for a while thereafter. If they don't . . .
A Good Start for the Ulman Administration
One of the most important functions of a County Executive is to choose, and then manage, a good executive team. County Executive Ulman hit a home run here. Knowing that we have this kind of talent working on development and housing issues is reassuring.
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Friday, December 29, 2006
There's a New Blogger in Town
Freemarket asks a good question: Is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "good for us?" Freemarket prefaces his question with the following commentary:
When the FDA makes a mistake, one of two things will happen. Either a drug that is harmful will be approved, or a drug that is beneficial will be delayed or unapproved for use. Both of these mistakes will cost lives, but which would the FDA be more fearful of? Surely litigation and sullied reputation would be strong incentives for the FDA not to approve a drug that hurts people, but these same fears of litigation and embarrassment impact the behaviors of the drug companies as well. For this type of mistake, I doubt that the FDA adds much to the protections already in place by the legal system and the market. However, when the FDA delays or rejects a drug that is beneficial or the regulations of the FDA makes drug research so expensive that rare diseases are not worked on by drug companies, who bears the cost of this mistake, and who even knows about it? The sick who could have been helped have no knowledge of the harm caused to them by the FDA.I respectfully dissent Freemarket. First, Freemarket assumes that the legal system and marketplace will both work to ensure a supply of safe and effective drugs. In theory, that is correct. However, there is no real world evidence to support this theory. On the other hand, the state of affairs that existed before the creation of the FDA is proof positive that the legal system and "freemarket" were insufficient to protect consumers (and legitimate business people too, who had to compete with the corner cutters too). I've been working in the legal profession and in goverment(s) for over 20 years now, and I would trust Government Bureaucrats over the legal system any day to protect my safety. (In my opinion, Government bureaucrats are unfairly maligned). Since safety is an externality, it can't be trusted to the "freemarket." (The quotation marks are used to indicate my doubt that truly free markets exist often in the real world, rather than any personal distrust of our newest blogger). Who would you rather have judge the merits and safety of a drug: a jury of twelve people off the street or pharmaceutical experts? Did the legal system stop the marketing of tobacco and asbestos?
Second, no drug is completely safe and completely effective. What is important is that any drug's side effects are well understood and that their effectiveness is throughly tested before being placed in the market place. And its important that there be a unbiased referee to make these judgments in an impartial, objective and fair manner. One of the reasons the question posed by Freemarket is a good one, is that the FDA no longer functions as originally intended, its become over politicized and a pawn of the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Its actually pretty rare that the FDA rejects a drug thats been submitted by the pharmaceutical industry (most of the bad drugs are dropped by the companies who don't want to waste money and potential liability on drugs that have a long shot at FDA approval).
It rankles me to read the line about FDA approval costs causing the lack of drugs for rare diseases. Are you aware that the Pharmaceutical Industry is the most profitable major (legal) industry out there? Whats wrong with requiring a drug to be throughly tested before its marketed? Could the fact that rare diseases don't get the needed research be that the potential market is so small? Could it be that this is just one more example of why the free market can't be trusted to do everything?
And can you name a single drug that has been pulled from the market, by the FDA, because of a single death?
I'm not saying that the FDA is perfect or even operating in an acceptable manner. I do think that the United States needs to have a fair and effective program regulating the safety of pharmaceuticals.
It Looks Like the Regressive Senior Tax Cut is Here to Stay
Its time for fineline's first Personal Ad:
Former Councilman and County Executive candidate is seeking hot senior citizen (over 69) with less than $75,000 per annum income for short courtship and then marriage (must take place by June 1, 2007).
Thursday, December 28, 2006
Delegate Bobo Sponsors Important Environmental Legislation
The bill, which will be sponsored by Del. Elizabeth Bobo, a Howard County Democrat, would bring Maryland in line with standards originally adopted in California for limiting releases of three known or suspected cancer-causing chemicals.
Of course the coast is not clear:
The so-called Clean Cars Program is expected to face continued resistance from the auto industry.I'll be watching this bill. It might just save your life.
Brad Heavner, director of Environment Maryland and a veteran environmental lobbyist, said at a news conference at Sinai Hospital that a new report by his group shows the cancer risk associated with the three chemicals is 40 times higher in Maryland than the federal Environmental Protection Agency's benchmark.
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
A UMBC Professor with National Reputation has some Interesting Advice for Democrats
I think he's right that we don't need the south to win. I also agree that by trying to cater to southern voters, the Democrats could alienate their northern, mid-western and western bases.
But I wouldn't stop trying to win over the South. They are not hopeless.
A Sobering Article on Iraq
R.I.P. President Gerald Ford
On the Local HoCo Scene
Sunshine Is the Best Disinfectant
Is the Housing Slump Already Over?
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
Its Good to See
That should be good for the County.
Biden Opposes Iraq "Surge" Plan
Whenever I read or hear about this surge plan, I'm reminded of Vietnam. Its Deja Vu all over again. You would think that at least McCain would remember Vietnam. The other Republicans all had "more important things" to do.
More Inconveinent Truth
Bad Economic News
U.S. military death toll in Iraq exceeds number of deaths in 9/11 attacks
Is Iran's Oil Production Falling?
Interesting Article on the Democrats' Congressional Agenda
Determined to banish their old tax-and-spend image, Democrats want to shrink the federal deficit, preserve tax cuts for the middle class and challenge the president to raise money for the Iraq war when they take control of Congress next week. (emphasis supplied).
That first line bugs me. The Democrats have a tax and spend image? Has anyone at the Post been reading thier own paper? That's not the only disturbing item in this article. It states:
The incoming Democratic chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees . . . reiterated a commitment not to cut off funding for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.The only way the Democrats can get us out of Iraq is by cutting off funding. Thats what got us out of Vietnam, by the way. So, it looks like we are there to stay. Another key paragraph from the article:
[Democratic leaders] said they would aim to balance the budget by 2012, a goal that could anger liberal Democrats eager for new spending on domestic programs and conservative Republicans determined to preserve the tax cuts passed during Bush's first term.
Without this stupid war . . . . Anyway read this article. If you want to know whats really happening in Washington, always follow the money. One final paragraph bears emphasis as well:
Democrats say they will cover that cost by ending tax breaks on foreign profits of U.S. businesses, closing corporate tax shelters, cutting subsidies to oil and gas companies and giving the federal government authority to negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare. They would also tap the vast amount of uncollected tax revenue known as the tax gap, which has been projected at $300 billion a year.
Monday, December 25, 2006
Merry Christmas
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Some Pork is Nutritious
Think Twice Before Contributing to the United Way
Ken is wise to consider discontinuing the County's participation in the United Way.
While I'm upset about the rich Senior tax break
The regressive tax break won't end the world.
Yet, the world just ended for five American troops and their families.
If the Democrats don't fight to get us out of Iraq . . .
American Auto Manufacturers Once Dominated the Industry
Interestingly, the American Car Industry has always done better with Democrats in the Whitehouse, but of course they have always supported the Republicans.